Cartoon characters and pornography

Last week, I drafted an arti­cle on a NSW Supreme Court deci­sion, find­ing a man guilty of pos­sess­ing child pornog­ra­phy, in the form of a car­toon depict­ing var­i­ous mem­bers of the Simpsons fam­ily in sex­ual acts. But I didn’t pub­lish it. I cen­sored myself, because frankly in the cur­rent cli­mate, where a man in Queensland is being inves­ti­gated by what is in effect the child sex offences for what appears to be noth­ing more than upload­ing a video that depicts what may be con­sid­ered child abuse (a child being swirled around rather roughly) to a video shar­ing site, who knows what will or won’t get you in hot water, or worse. The fact that the video had appeared on Television in the US, and viewed by mil­lions around the world. Even view­ing it in Australia may be an offence.

So, rather than putting my thoughts here, I’ll link to an arti­cle by the esteemed US jour­nal­ist William Saletan, at Slate, and his thoughts on the spe­cific sit­u­a­tion here. I hope link­ing to it is not some kind if offence.

Your opinion:

XHTML: You're allowed to use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>