Fix Outlook

Personally, like other old web cur­mud­geons (OK so Dave Shea isn’t really old), I’m not a big fan of either send­ing or receiv­ing HTML email. But, it’s a real­ity of life, and more impor­tantly if some­thing sup­ports HTML, it should to the extent pos­si­ble sup­port mod­ern web devel­op­ment best prac­tices. Something that Outlook, the email client used by many mil­lions doesn’t do (mind you, nei­ther does Gmail, and other email clients and online apps, but that’s for another day).

So, our good friends at Campaign Monitor have decided to do some­thing about it (and indeed, have been doing some­thing about poor stan­dards sup­port in all man­ner of email clients for some time with their “email stan­dards” project).

A day or so ago, they started a twit­ter based cam­paign fixout­look (OK, so restrict­ing it to just twit­ter might have been less than ideal, but…). In a day or so, the cam­paign has gen­er­ated over 20,000 responses — clearly folks care about this sort of thing!

Sadly, the response from the Outlook team, while fast, has not been pos­i­tive. The response to their response (see com­ments) has been as fast, and far from in agreement.

Two lessons I draw from this. First, the web is the web is the web — you either sup­port it or you don’t — that seems to be the mes­sage com­ing from all angles. It’s a les­son Microsoft’s browser divi­sion cer­tainly embraced with IE7 and 8, and per­haps needs to be bet­ter under­stood by oth­ers within that admit­tedly many headed orga­ni­za­tion. The sec­ond is that when folks care, it takes less than a day to rally thou­sands upon thou­sands to voice their con­cerns. Personally, as I said at the top — I’m Old Skool. Email == plain text for me. But that’s not the point. The masses have spo­ken. What hap­pens next? We’ll have to see.

Your opinion:

XHTML: You're allowed to use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>