<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google Chrome exits beta</title> <atom:link href="http://www.webdirections.org/blog/google-chrome-exits-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/google-chrome-exits-beta/</link> <description>Just another WordPress weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:54:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Gary Barber</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/google-chrome-exits-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-115056</link> <dc:creator>Gary Barber</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:12:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1319#comment-115056</guid> <description>It&#039;s just another test bed.  I too still can&#039;t see how marketing wise Chrome fits in the big picture.   Is it an extension for the Google apps and docs suite that is developing. Or is it just a standalone project that was a nice re-skinning around webkit.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s just another test bed.  I too still can’t see how marketing wise Chrome fits in the big picture.   Is it an extension for the Google apps and docs suite that is developing. Or is it just a standalone project that was a nice re-skinning around webkit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard Fink</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/google-chrome-exits-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-115007</link> <dc:creator>Richard Fink</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1319#comment-115007</guid> <description>To me, all in all, it&#039;s a pain in the ass. Another browser to test on? As we used to say when I was growing up in Brooklyn, NY, &quot;Gedoudaheah!&quot;.On the other hand, I can&#039;t make it go away and it&#039;s based on WebKit and I&#039;m hoping that it&#039;s a reliable testing substitute for Safari/Windows. Most Mac users might never have had the displeasure - but Safari&#039;s font-rendering in Windows is absolutely horrendous.And then also, there&#039;s a lot of talent at Google and maybe they&#039;ll come up with some novel extensions or additional functionality that might prove useful accross the whole browser board.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, all in all, it’s a pain in the ass.<br /> Another browser to test on?<br /> As we used to say when I was growing up in Brooklyn, NY, “Gedoudaheah!”.</p><p>On the other hand, I can’t make it go away and it’s based on WebKit and I’m hoping that it’s a reliable testing substitute for Safari/Windows.<br /> Most Mac users might never have had the displeasure — but Safari’s font-rendering in Windows is absolutely horrendous.</p><p>And then also, there’s a lot of talent at Google and maybe they’ll come up with some novel extensions or additional functionality that might prove useful accross the whole browser board.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Foss</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/google-chrome-exits-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-114811</link> <dc:creator>Jason Foss</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:47:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1319#comment-114811</guid> <description>We were talking about this in the office earlier today. And I just can&#039;t see where Chrome fits in. People who are likely to leave IE will tend to move to Firefox I believe - and as a developer the extensions in Firefox make it invaluable.What&#039;s Chrome&#039;s point of difference? In practical terms it just doesn&#039;t offer any real incentive to switch.I did download Chrome when it was first released and used it for a few days, and then though, &quot;what&#039;s the point?&quot;. Back to Firefox for me.Do we need another browser? Probably not.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were talking about this in the office earlier today. And I just can’t see where Chrome fits in. People who are likely to leave IE will tend to move to Firefox I believe — and as a developer the extensions in Firefox make it invaluable.</p><p>What’s Chrome’s point of difference? In practical terms it just doesn’t offer any real incentive to switch.</p><p>I did download Chrome when it was first released and used it for a few days, and then though, “what’s the point?”. Back to Firefox for me.</p><p>Do we need another browser? Probably not.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/google-chrome-exits-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-114742</link> <dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:04:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1319#comment-114742</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does the world need a new browser?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Yes. But only if it improves upon what already exists. Chrome shows potential for being sufficiently worth it, but I&#039;ll suspend judgement until I use it a bit more (and they release it for Mac OS X).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does the world need a new browser?</p></blockquote><p>Yes. But only if it improves upon what already exists. Chrome shows potential for being sufficiently worth it, but I’ll suspend judgement until I use it a bit more (and they release it for Mac OS X).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 424/432 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.webdirections.org @ 2012-02-09 17:45:52 -->
