<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The State of the Web survey results</title> <atom:link href="http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/</link> <description>Just another WordPress weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:25:19 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-129900</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:08:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1478#comment-129900</guid> <description>Hi Peter,I didn&#039;t document it as well as I should have but you guessed correctly - where it makes sense, folks could give multiple answers - such as databases, languages, and so on. In other cases - like primary OS or browser, only on answer was possibleThanksjohn</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p><p>I didn’t document it as well as I should have but you guessed correctly — where it makes sense, folks could give multiple answers — such as databases, languages, and so on. In other cases — like primary OS or browser, only on answer was possible</p><p>Thanks</p><p>john</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter R. Wood</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-129876</link> <dc:creator>Peter R. Wood</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:56:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1478#comment-129876</guid> <description>After re-reading some of the commentary, I&#039;m guessing that the 111% is due to some people making multiple selections for database?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After re-reading some of the commentary, I’m guessing that the 111% is due to some people making multiple selections for database?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter R. Wood</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-129875</link> <dc:creator>Peter R. Wood</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:53:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1478#comment-129875</guid> <description>Curious about the percentages for databases:&lt;blockquote&gt;Over 90% sites are database driven, with the open source MySQL at 70% and PostrgeSQL at 10% together accounting for the significant majority of sites by respondents. Microsoft’s SQL Server at 22% and Oracle at 9% were the other widely used database systems.&lt;/blockquote&gt;70%+10%+22%+9% = 111% ??</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious about the percentages for databases:</p><blockquote><p>Over 90% sites are database driven, with the open source MySQL at 70% and PostrgeSQL at 10% together accounting for the significant majority of sites by respondents. Microsoft’s SQL Server at 22% and Oracle at 9% were the other widely used database systems.</p></blockquote><p>70%+10%+22%+9% = 111% ??</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Russ</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-128602</link> <dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:38:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1478#comment-128602</guid> <description>Interesting to note that in the very short period of time that Google Chrome has been about, it already commands a slightly increased user-base over the far more established Opera. I appreciate this was a survey of developers but I&#039;d be keen to here possible reasons for this - surely Chrome isn&#039;t &quot;better&quot; than Opera!? ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to note that in the very short period of time that Google Chrome has been about, it already commands a slightly increased user-base over the far more established Opera. I appreciate this was a survey of developers but I’d be keen to here possible reasons for this — surely Chrome isn’t “better” than Opera!? ;-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MentalX</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-128577</link> <dc:creator>MentalX</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:22:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1478#comment-128577</guid> <description>[...] the Web Directions conferences, and &#8220;Scroll&#8221; magazine. You can catch the summary here: http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/. And the full results here: [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] the Web Directions conferences, and “Scroll” magazine. You can catch the summary here: <a
href="http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/" rel="nofollow">http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/</a>. And the full results here: […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matthew Riley MacPherson</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-128483</link> <dc:creator>Matthew Riley MacPherson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:21:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1478#comment-128483</guid> <description>In reply to George&#039;s question regarding server-side JavaScript: a lot of people don&#039;t know this, but you can &lt;strong&gt;write ASP in Microsoft&#039;s JScript&lt;/strong&gt;. Where I work, a lot of our big sites are run on our IIS server, and we write &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; of our ASP in JScript (VBScript is a pretty darn awful way to make web sites).Apparently, you can develop ASP in a few other languages too, but I&#039;ve never investigated that. JScript is pretty nice though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to George’s question regarding server-side JavaScript: a lot of people don’t know this, but you can <strong>write ASP in Microsoft’s JScript</strong>. Where I work, a lot of our big sites are run on our IIS server, and we write <em>all</em> of our ASP in JScript (VBScript is a pretty darn awful way to make web sites).</p><p>Apparently, you can develop ASP in a few other languages too, but I’ve never investigated that. JScript is pretty nice though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: State of the Web survey results from ~12 &#8230; &#171; Paul M. Watson</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-128453</link> <dc:creator>State of the Web survey results from ~12 &#8230; &#171; Paul M. Watson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:48:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1478#comment-128453</guid> <description>[...] am on January 13, 2009 &#124; # &#124;   Tags: dev   State of the Web survey results from ~1200 web-developers. Good to see jQuery doing well. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] am on January 13, 2009 | # |   Tags: dev   State of the Web survey results from ~1200 web-developers. Good to see jQuery doing well. […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The State of the Web&#160;2008 &#187; Broken Links</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-128418</link> <dc:creator>The State of the Web&#160;2008 &#187; Broken Links</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:53:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1478#comment-128418</guid> <description>[...] Directions have posted the results of their 2008 survey today; full results and selected highlights are available. The most shocking result to me is that 10% of respondents still use tables [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Directions have posted the results of their 2008 survey today; full results and selected highlights are available. The most shocking result to me is that 10% of respondents still use tables […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-128280</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:25:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1478#comment-128280</guid> <description>Hi Brian,good thoughts. As the compiler of the report, it took me a little by surprise - particularly at 20% - I guess because we tend to think of Flash and Silverlight in this space.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian,</p><p>good thoughts. As the compiler of the report, it took me a little by surprise — particularly at 20% — I guess because we tend to think of Flash and Silverlight in this space.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://www.webdirections.org/blog/the-state-of-the-web-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-128275</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:21:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdirections.org/?p=1478#comment-128275</guid> <description>Not sure why the Quicktime result is described as &#039;surprising&#039;. If you just want to put a movie or sound clip online, it works reliably, whereas WMP never seems to have the right codec and/or you&#039;re trying to use it in an office that doesn&#039;t allow extra software to be installed. It&#039;s always hard to unseat a reliable incumbent. So Silverlight - cool but who cares?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why the Quicktime result is described as ‘surprising’. If you just want to put a movie or sound clip online, it works reliably, whereas WMP never seems to have the right codec and/or you’re trying to use it in an office that doesn’t allow extra software to be installed. It’s always hard to unseat a reliable incumbent. So Silverlight — cool but who cares?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/20 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.webdirections.org @ 2010-03-18 23:20:18 -->