Can the Cellphone Help End Global Poverty?

and cure cancer…

Despite news­pa­per sub-​​editors love hyper­bole (hey you are read­ing this aren’t you) some­times the sen­sa­tion­ally head­lined arti­cles are worth reading.

In last year’s clos­ing keynote pre­sen­ta­tion, the inspir­ing Mark Pesce men­tioned the adop­tion of mobile phones in the fish­ing mar­kets of Kerala in south­ern India, and how these have greatly improved the lives of many in that part of the world. To me at least, this was a won­der­ful anti­dote to those who crit­i­cise the one lap­top per child project with the argu­ment that “poor peo­ple need food not tech­nol­ogy”. Mark demon­strated that in fact, tech­nol­ogy helps peo­ple emerge from poverty under their own steam — an inspir­ing mes­sage, com­pared with the “feed the world” pater­nal­ism of ear­lier well inten­tioned, but far from suc­cess­ful approaches to address­ing global inequality.

So, what’s the point of the head­line? Well, you’ll find a long arti­cle in the New York Times Magazine with that title that is well worth a read. It focusses on the work of Jan Chipchase, a human-​​behavior researcher as Nokia, who seems to spend his life wan­der­ing the earth (and to just major west­ern cap­i­tals, but Africa, the for­mer soviet republics east of the Urals, and other more out of the way places) try­ing to learn a lit­tle more about how peo­ple use tech­nol­ogy in their lives.

Well worth a read with your morn­ing cuppa.

It’s actu­ally a big week for Chipchase, as he is also cited in a spe­cial report on “dig­i­tal nomads” (I think I’m even less of a fan of pseudo-​​categories like “dig­i­tal nomads” than hyper­bolic head­lines, but they seem to work for other folks) by the esteemed Economist Magazine (you have to pay for the full report, though there is a quite sub­stan­tial intro­duc­tory arti­cle online).

Above all what is inter­est­ing about these arti­cles, is that it indi­cates that many of the approaches to design and analy­sis that have come to promi­nence on the web, and which we’ve fea­tured at pre­vi­ous con­fer­ences, things like “user cen­tred design”, and “design ethnog­ra­phy” are becom­ing main­stream concepts.

We’ll con­tinue to focus on these approaches and issues at Web Directions (in Melbourne for exam­ple, we have a pre­sen­ta­tion by Dr. Jackie Moyes, now at News Digital Media, to help teams get their com­pa­nies to adopt more user-​​centred design approaches), and it is really encour­ag­ing to see them more widely adopted and understood.

One response to “Can the Cellphone Help End Global Poverty?”:

    • By:Jackie Moyes
    • May 14th, 2008

    Hey John,

    Thanks for the plug. :)

    Actually I was chat­ting to Carey Eaton who is Director of African Associates and writes and runs this site: http://​www​.africanoz​.com​.au/. He is orig­i­nally from Kenya and his fam­ily still live there. He told me that dur­ing the recent riots pre­pay mobile phone credit BECAME cur­rency. ATMs ran out of money, and there­fore no-​​one had money for food. No one had money for phone credit either. However, some bright spark came up with the idea of allow­ing peo­ple to pay for phone credit on the inter­net. So for instance the guy I was talk­ing to used his credit card to pur­chase phone credit for is par­ents. The credit was SMSed to them and they could go to a shop and swap the SMS for credit (not sure of the exact details on how this part worked). Anyway, this became cur­rency as many peo­ple swapped their phone cred­its for food.

    He argued the mobile phone usage is more advanced in Africa than here in Australia. It is CORE to their lived. Nomadic herds­men for instance, will send an SMS round their tribe then they spy rain, so every­one knows where to heard their ani­mals to. They will also phone in to town on mar­ket day to see whether the cur­rent price for sell­ing pro­duce was valu­able enough to make the trek in. If it is, they will head in to town, and while they are there they will put their phone in to the phone charger shop to charge up… as they are nomadic and there­fore don’t have elec­tric­ity themselves.

Your opinion:

XHTML: You're allowed to use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>