Data driven design — a debate that isn’t going away?

You’ll all remem­ber the mini fra­cas a month or so back when Doug Bowman pulled up stumps at Google, and moved on to the role of Creative Director at Twitter.

John and I thought there was def­i­nitely enough meat on this topic for a thought pro­vok­ing ses­sion at the con­fer­ence this year, so we were delighted when some­one sent us in the direc­tion of local designer Luke Stevens, who will be giv­ing us his insights and hope­fully encour­ag­ing a bit of debate in his ses­sion at Web Directions South this year.

Luke’s just pub­lished a thought pro­vok­ing blog post with some of his thoughts on what hap­pened between Doug and Google. It’s a great taster for what I think will be a really inter­est­ing ses­sion come October.

With that in mind, I do have one nit to pick with Doug Bowman. He fin­ished his piece on leav­ing Google by say­ing “But I won’t miss a design phi­los­o­phy that lives or dies strictly by the sword of data.”

Web design, in my view, should live or die by the sword of data.

I’ll tell you why: every bit of ‘data’ isn’t an abstract thing. It’s a per­son like you or me try­ing to do some­thing, and suc­ceed­ing or failing.

On the web, you can mea­sure what peo­ple do. You can mea­sure what they click, how long they stay for, if they scroll, how many pages they view, if they ‘bounce’, if they return, and so on. You can ask if they were suc­cess­ful or not. For per­haps the first time in his­tory we can accu­rately mea­sure all inter­ac­tions with a piece of design.

If it can be mea­sured, it can be improved. And each of those improve­ments rep­re­sents help­ing some­one do some­thing a lit­tle more successfully.

The full arti­cle makes a great piece of lunch time reading.

Your opinion:

XHTML: You're allowed to use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>